<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>ecoexist.net &#187; insulation</title>
	<atom:link href="http://ecoexist.net/archives/tag/insulation/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://ecoexist.net</link>
	<description>Ideas for those who might be new to thinking environmentally.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 03 Aug 2010 03:26:37 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Insulation project</title>
		<link>http://ecoexist.net/archives/211</link>
		<comments>http://ecoexist.net/archives/211#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Dec 2008 08:44:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Projects]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[do it yourself]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[insulation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[soy foam insulation]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ecoexist.net/?p=211</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[We live in a home built in 1952, which apparently is before the concept of insulation. Last spring we tackled insulating our attic. It was probably, at best, insulated to an r-value of 5 in a couple of areas and completely devoid of insulation in most places. Now it&#8217;s probably somewhere between an r-value of [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>We live in a home built in 1952, which apparently is before the concept of insulation. Last spring we tackled <A HREF="http://ecoexist.net/archives/18"><U><B>insulating our attic</B></U></A>. It was probably, at best, insulated to an r-value of 5 in a couple of areas and completely devoid of insulation in most places. Now it&#8217;s probably somewhere between an r-value of 30-35 with 8-10 inches of blown in cellulose insulation. It cost us about $350 for the materials ($325) and blower rental ($20) and about 3 hours of our time one afternoon. It was a step in the right direction, but it didn&#8217;t have much of an effect in the heat this summer since the walls aren&#8217;t insulated.<br />
<P><br />
One of the big projects I have slated for this winter is to finally insulate our walls. I&#8217;ve been looking into all of the different insulation methods and narrowed it down to two in particular &#8211; denim cellulose and spray foam. Both of which are (or at least can be) green, and I can do them myself. Without going into too much detail, the decision was ultimately made based on ease of installation and overall r-value. Cost was also somewhat of a factor initially, but comfort won out over cost in the end and I decided on soy foam insulation. Here are the basic comparisons base on 1200 sq ft of wall space (@ 1 inch deep):<BR><br />
<B>Cellulose</B><BR><br />
<UL><br />
<LI>rvalue = <A HREF="http://apps1.eere.energy.gov/consumer/your_home/insulation_airsealing/index.cfm/mytopic=11660" TARGET=_new><U><B>3.7 @ 1 inch deep</B></U></A></LI><br />
<LI>installation requires at least 2 people and a hopper that can be turned off/on by the person applying the insulation</LI><br />
<LI>total cost for 1000 sq linear ft = $1050 (sorry, can&#8217;t find the link at the moment)</LI><br />
</UL><br />
<P><br />
<B>Spray foam <strike>(soy)</strike></B> <I>Thanks for the correction Jamie!</I><BR><br />
<UL><br />
<LI>rvalue = approx <A HREF="http://apps1.eere.energy.gov/consumer/your_home/insulation_airsealing/index.cfm/mytopic=11600" TARGET=_new><U><B>7-8 @ 1 inch deep</B></U></A></LI><br />
<LI>single person insulation is feasible</LI><br />
<LI>total cost for 1000 sq linear ft = $1370 <A HREF="http://www.sprayfoamdirect.com/products/index.php?page=shop.product_details&#038;flypage=shop.flypage&#038;product_id=30&#038;category_id=6&#038;manufacturer_id=0&#038;option=com_virtuemart&#038;Itemid=1&#038;vmcchk=1&#038;Itemid=1" TARGET=_new><U><B>link to site</B></U></A></LI><br />
</UL><br />
<P><br />
So for about $300 more than cellulose insulation we&#8217;ll be getting twice the rvalue per square inch. The decision was pretty easy in the end. There is one other <A HREF="http://www.betterfoam.com/" TARGET=_new><U><B>&#8220;honorable mention&#8221;</B></U></A> that I should point out. It is still green in the long run and a little closer in price to the cellulose insulation at about $1050 as well, although you will need to keep in mind that the foam I listed above includes shipping and 17 installation tools, while this kit does not (at least not at the time of this writing). I&#8217;m hoping to complete this project by mid-January.<br />
<BR></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://ecoexist.net/archives/211/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Insulation project, initial results</title>
		<link>http://ecoexist.net/archives/27</link>
		<comments>http://ecoexist.net/archives/27#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 27 Apr 2008 18:04:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Projects]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[do it yourself]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[efficiency]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[insulation]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ecoexist.net/?p=27</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Last weekend I blew insulation into the attic. It has been relatively temperate all week so the results of the project haven&#8217;t been very noticeable. Yesterday, however, it hit 95 degrees and I see the direct benefits finally. There are a few factors to point out first. Last year the thermostat was set three degrees [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Last weekend I <A HREF="http://ecoexist.net/archives/18" TARGET=_top><U>blew insulation into the attic</U></A>. It has been relatively temperate all week so the results of the project haven&#8217;t been very noticeable. Yesterday, however, it hit 95 degrees and I see the direct benefits finally.<br />
<P><br />
There are a few factors to point out first. Last year the thermostat was set three degrees lower than it is this year. Also, the gable fan I installed a few weeks back will have an affect on the results as well. So, this won&#8217;t be a direct comparison, but still &#8211; the results are noticeable.<br />
<P><br />
Last year, a 95 degree day would have caused the AC to be on somewhere in the neighborhood of 7-8 hours. Yesterday, the AC was on for a total of just under 3 hours &#8211; a whole four to five hours less than last year. That&#8217;s going to make a noticeable difference. When we replace the windows next winter, and possibly insulate the outside walls (hopefully we&#8217;ll be able to) then it should drop that time down to under an hour, I would imagine.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://ecoexist.net/archives/27/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
